The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments
The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments
- 眼科实践与研究新进展 2022年2卷第1期 页码：100042
- 作者机构：
1. ,Hangzhou,China
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
DOI：10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100042
中图分类号：
扫 描 看 全 文
The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments[J]. 眼科实践与研究新进展, 2022,2(1):100042.
Yanan Zhu, Yueyang Zhong, Yanyan Fu. The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments[J]. AOPR, 2022,2(1):100042.
The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments[J]. 眼科实践与研究新进展, 2022,2(1):100042. DOI： 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100042.
Yanan Zhu, Yueyang Zhong, Yanyan Fu. The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments[J]. AOPR, 2022,2(1):100042. DOI： 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100042.
摘要
Background,Presbyopia has become a global disease affecting the world's aging population. Among various treatments, cataract extraction and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation have become the most popular and common methods of presbyopia correction. During the twentieth century, IOLs have underwent significant innovation and advancements to meet the patients' high demands for functional vision at all distances.,Main Text,To meet the increasing needs for excellent near and intermediate vision for daily activities, some premium IOLs with more than one focus have been developed, for example, the refractive MfIOLs, diffractive MfIOLs, extended depth of field (EDOF) IOLs, and accommodating IOLs (AIOLs) were introduced to meet this need. In addition, the add-on MfIOLs have been explored as promising supplementary IOLs for pseudophakic presbyopia. When selecting the MfIOLs, the IOLs' features, patients’ characteristics, preoperative eye conditions, and treatment expectations should be considered.,Conclusions,In this review, we focus on the multifocal IOLs (MfIOLs) commonly used for presbyopia correction and systematically summarized their optical designs and clinical outcomes. More evidence-based studies are required to provide guidelines for MfIOL selection, provide maximum visual benefits, and develop personalized visual solutions in the future.
Abstract
Background,Presbyopia has become a global disease affecting the world's aging population. Among various treatments, cataract extraction and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation have become the most popular and common methods of presbyopia correction. During the twentieth century, IOLs have underwent significant innovation and advancements to meet the patients' high demands for functional vision at all distances.,Main Text,To meet the increasing needs for excellent near and intermediate vision for daily activities, some premium IOLs with more than one focus have been developed, for example, the refractive MfIOLs, diffractive MfIOLs, extended depth of field (EDOF) IOLs, and accommodating IOLs (AIOLs) were introduced to meet this need. In addition, the add-on MfIOLs have been explored as promising supplementary IOLs for pseudophakic presbyopia. When selecting the MfIOLs, the IOLs' features, patients’ characteristics, preoperative eye conditions, and treatment expectations should be considered.,Conclusions,In this review, we focus on the multifocal IOLs (MfIOLs) commonly used for presbyopia correction and systematically summarized their optical designs and clinical outcomes. More evidence-based studies are required to provide guidelines for MfIOL selection, provide maximum visual benefits, and develop personalized visual solutions in the future.
关键词
Keywords
PresbyopiaIntraocular lensMonofocal intraocular lensMultifocal intraocular lensExtended depth of field intraocular lensAccommodating intraocular lensClinical outcomes
references
1 J.S. Wolffsohn, L.N. DaviesPresbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies Prog Retin Eye Res, 68 (2019), pp. 124-143, 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004
2 D. Zamora-de La Cruz, K. Zúñiga-Posselt, et al.Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6 (2020), p. CD012648, 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub2
3 L.N. Davies, M.A. Croft, E. Papas, et al.Presbyopia: physiology, prevention and pathways to correction Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 36 (2016), pp. 1-4, 10.1111/opo.12272
4 N.E. de Vries, R.M.M.A. NuijtsMultifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects J Cataract Refract Surg, 39 (2013), pp. 268-278, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.002
5 W.N. CharmanDevelopments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 34 (2014), pp. 8-29, 10.1111/opo.12091
6 S.R. Lord, J. Dayhew, A. HowlandMultifocal glasses impair edge-contrast sensitivity and depth perception and increase the risk of falls in older people J Am Geriatr Soc, 50 (2002), pp. 1760-1766, 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50502.x
7 A. AbdelkaderImproved presbyopic vision with miotics Eye Contact Lens, 41 (2015), pp. 323-327, 10.1097/icl.0000000000000137
8 J. Benozzi, G. Benozzi, B. OrmanPresbyopia: a new potential pharmacological treatment Med Hypothesis, Discov Innovation (MEHDI) Ophthalmol, 1 (2012), pp. 3-5
9 G.H. Wang Yin, C. McAlinden, E. Pieri, et al.Surgical treatment of presbyopia with central presbyopic keratomileusis: one-year results J Cataract Refract Surg, 42 (2016), pp. 1415-1423, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.031
10 N. Menassa, A. Fitting, G.U. Auffarth, et al.Visual outcomes and corneal changes after intrastromal femtosecond laser correction of presbyopia J Cataract Refract Surg, 38 (2012), pp. 765-773, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.051
11 Y.C. Liu, B. Hall, N.C. Lwin, et al.Tissue responses and wound healing following laser scleral microporation for presbyopia therapy Transl Vis Sci Technol, 9 (2020), p. 6, 10.1167/tvst.9.4.6
12 D.R. Hamilton, J.M. Davidorf, R.K. MaloneyAnterior ciliary sclerotomy for treatment of presbyopia: a prospective controlled study Ophthalmology, 109 (2002), 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01252-6 1970–6; discussion 1976-7
13 J.L. Alio, A.B. Plaza-Puche, R. Férnandez-Buenaga, et al.Multifocal intraocular lenses: an overview Surv Ophthalmol, 62 (2017), pp. 611-634, 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.03.005
14 P.S. Kollbaum, A. BradleyCorrection of presbyopia: old problems with old (and new) solutions Clin Exp Optom, 103 (2020), pp. 21-30, 10.1111/cxo.12987
15 B. Chung, S. Choi, Y.W. Ji, et al.Comparison of objective accommodation in phakic and pseudophakic eyes between age groups Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 257 (2019), pp. 575-582, 10.1007/s00417-019-04249-7
16 A. Mahrous, J.B. Ciralsky, E.C. LaiRevisiting monovision for presbyopia Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 29 (2018), pp. 313-317, 10.1097/icu.0000000000000487
17 F. Zeri, M. Berchicci, S.A. Naroo, et al.Immediate cortical adaptation in visual and non-visual areas functions induced by monovision: immediate cortical adaptation induced by monovision J Physiol, 596 (2018), pp. 253-266, 10.1113/JP274896
18 G. Muñoz, C. Albarrán-Diego, T. Ferrer-Blasco, et al.Visual function after bilateral implantation of a new zonal refractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lens J Cataract Refract Surg, 37 (2011), pp. 2043-2052, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.045
19 S. Cillino, A. Casuccio, F. Di Pace, et al.One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses Ophthalmology, 115 (2008), pp. 1508-1516, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017
20 H.N. Sen, A.-U. Sarikkola, R.J. Uusitalo, et al.Quality of vision after AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens implantation J Cataract Refract Surg, 30 (2004), pp. 2483-2493, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.049
21 J.L. Alió, M. Tavolato, F. De la Hoz, et al.Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study J Cataract Refract Surg, 30 (2004), pp. 2494-2503, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.052
22 G. Muñoz, C. Albarrán-Diego, A. Cerviño, et al.Visual and optical performance with the ReZoom multifocal intraocular lens Eur J Ophthalmol, 22 (2012), pp. 356-362, 10.5301/ejo.5000030
23 S. Gierek-Ciaciura, L. Cwalina, L. Bednarski, et al.A comparative clinical study of the visual results between three types of multifocal lenses Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 248 (2010), pp. 133-140, 10.1007/s00417-009-1177-4
24 T.M. Rabsilber, P. Rudalevicius, V. Jasinskas, et al.Influence of +3.00 D and +4.00 D near addition on functional outcomes of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens model J Cataract Refract Surg, 39 (2013), pp. 350-357, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.09.026
25 R. Nuzzi, F. TridicoComparison of visual outcomes, spectacles dependence and patient satisfaction of multifocal and accommodative intraocular lenses: innovative perspectives for maximal refractive-oriented cataract surgery BMC Ophthalmol, 17 (2017), p. 12, 10.1186/s12886-017-0411-9
26 D.J. Apple, J. SimsHarold Ridley and the invention of the intraocular lens Surv Ophthalmol, 40 (1996), pp. 279-292, 10.1016/s0039-6257(96)82003-0
27 L. WernerIntraocular lenses Ophthalmology, 128 (2021), pp. e74-93, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.06.055
28 J.E. Moore, R.N. McNeely, E.E. Pazo, et al.Rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses: preoperative considerations and postoperative outcomes Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 28 (2017), pp. 9-15, 10.1097/icu.0000000000000339
29 R.N. McNeely, E. Pazo, A. Spence, et al.Comparison of the visual performance and quality of vision with combined symmetrical inferonasal near addition versus inferonasal and superotemporal placement of rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lenses J Cataract Refract Surg, 42 (2016), pp. 1721-1729, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.016
30 G. BaikoffSurgical treatment of presbyopia: scleral, corneal, and lenticular Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 15 (2004), pp. 365-369, 10.1097/00055735-200408000-00014
31 D. Nakajima, H. Takahashi, S. KobayakawaClinical outcome of Lentis comfort intraocular lens implantation J Nippon Med Sch, 88 (2021), pp. 398-407, 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-504
32 J.L. Alio, D.P. Piñero, A.B. Plaza-Puche, et al.Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens J Cataract Refract Surg, 37 (2011), pp. 241-250, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.043
33 R. Shodai, K. Negishi, H. Arai, et al.Comparative analysis of the visual and refractive outcomes of a refractive segmented multifocal intraocular lens with and without toricity: 1-year results Jpn J Ophthalmol, 61 (2017), pp. 142-149, 10.1007/s10384-016-0497-2
34 R.N. McNeely, E. Pazo, A. Spence, et al.Visual quality and performance comparison between 2 refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses J Cataract Refract Surg, 43 (2017), pp. 1020-1026, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.05.039
35 R. Rampat, D. GatinelMultifocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in 2020 Ophthalmology, 128 (2021), pp. e164-e185, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.026
36 J.S. Kim, J.W. Jung, J.M. Lee, et al.Clinical outcomes following implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with varying add powers Am J Ophthalmol, 160 (2015), pp. 702-709, 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.021 e1
37 J.S.M. Chang, J.C.M. Ng, V.K.C. Chan, et al.Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after refractive lens exchange with a single-piece diffractive multifocal intraocular lens J Ophthalmol, 2014 (2014), pp. 1-8, 10.1155/2014/458296
38 F.T. Kretz, M. Gerl, R. Gerl, et al.Clinical evaluation of a new pupil independent diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with a +2.75 D near addition: a European multicentre study Br J Ophthalmol, 99 (2015), pp. 1655-1659, 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306811
39 J.S. Pepose, M.A. Qazi, R. Chu, et al.A prospective randomized clinical evaluation of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract extraction Am J Ophthalmol, 158 (2014), pp. 436-446, 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.06.003 e1
40 K. Hayashi, T. Sato, C. Igarashi, et al.Comparison of visual outcomes between bilateral trifocal intraocular lenses and combined bifocal intraocular lenses with different near addition Jpn J Ophthalmol, 63 (2019), pp. 429-436, 10.1007/s10384-019-00693-4
41 J.C. Vryghem, S. HeiremanVisual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens Clin Ophthalmol, 7 (2013), pp. 1957-1965, 10.2147/opth.s44415
42 D. Gatinel, C. Pagnoulle, Y. Houbrechts, et al.Design and qualification of a diffractive trifocal optical profile for intraocular lenses J Cataract Refract Surg, 37 (2011), pp. 2060-2067, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.047
43 D.W. Paik, J.S. Park, C.M. Yang, et al.Comparing the visual outcome, visual quality, and satisfaction among three types of multi-focal intraocular lenses Sci Rep, 10 (2020), p. 14832, 10.1038/s41598-020-69318-y
44 F. Poyales, N. Garzón, D. Pizarro, et al.Stability and visual outcomes yielded by three intraocular trifocal lenses with same optical zone design but differing material or toricity Eur J Ophthalmol, 29 (2019), pp. 417-425, 10.1177/1120672118795065
45 B. Cochener, G. Boutillier, M. Lamard, et al.A comparative evaluation of a new generation of diffractive trifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses J Refract Surg, 34 (2018), pp. 507-514, 10.3928/1081597X-20180530-02
46 T.B. Ferreira, F.J. RibeiroProspective comparison of clinical performance and subjective outcomes between two diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses in bilateral cataract surgery J Refract Surg, 35 (2019), pp. 418-425, 10.3928/1081597X-20190528-02
47 S.S. Haldipurkar, V. Shetty, D. Shah, et al.Comparison of post-cataract surgery visual outcomes and quality of life in patients bilaterally implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses Ophthalmol Ther, 10 (2021), pp. 101-113, 10.1007/s40123-020-00321-2
48 E. Pedrotti, F. Carones, F. Aiello, et al.Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision J Cataract Refract Surg, 44 (2018), pp. 156-167, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.11.011
49 P. Mojzis, D.P. Piñero, V. Ctvrteckova, et al.Analysis of internal astigmatism and higher order aberrations in eyes implanted with a new diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 251 (2013), pp. 341-348, 10.1007/s00417-012-2061-1
50 V. Maurino, B.D. Allan, G.S. Rubin, et al.Quality of vision after bilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a randomized trial–AT LISA 809M versus AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD1 Ophthalmology, 122 (2015), pp. 700-710, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.002
51 J.F. Alfonso, L. Fernández-Vega, A. Señaris, et al.Prospective study of the Acri.LISA bifocal intraocular lens J Cataract Refract Surg, 33 (2007), pp. 1930-1935, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.067
52 J.L. Alió, A.B. Plaza-Puche, D.P. Piñero, et al.Optical analysis, reading performance, and quality-of-life evaluation after implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens J Cataract Refract Surg, 37 (2011), pp. 27-37, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.035
53 J.F. Alfonso, L. Fernández-Vega, A. Señaris, et al.Quality of vision with the Acri. Twin asymmetric diffractive bifocal intraocular lens system J Cataract Refract Surg, 33 (2007), pp. 197-202, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.09.033
54 B. Bostanci Ceran, T. Takmaz, İ. Can, G. Demirok, et al.Clinical outcomes and optical performance of four differentmultifocal intraocular lenses Turk J Med Sci, 46 (2016), pp. 597-603, 10.3906/sag-1403-24
55 M. Wang, C.C. Corpuz, M. Fujiwara, et al.Visual and optical performances of multifocal intraocular lenses with three different near additions: 6-month follow-up Open Ophthalmol J, 9 (2015), pp. 1-7, 10.2174/1874364101509010001
56 A. Dyrda, A. Martínez-Palmer, D. Martín-Moral, et al.Clinical results of diffractive, refractive, hybrid multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses J Ophthalmol, 2018 (2018), pp. 1-12, 10.1155/2018/8285637
57 V.S.C. Webers, N.J.C. Bauer, I.E.Y. Saelens, et al.Comparison of the intermediate distance of a trifocal IOL with an extended depth-of-focus IOL: results of a prospective randomized trial J Cataract Refract Surg, 46 (2020), pp. 193-203, 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000012
58 R.R. Sudhir, A. Dey, S. Bhattacharrya, et al.AcrySof IQ PanOptix intraocular lens versus extended depth of focus intraocular lens and trifocal intraocular lens: a clinical overview Asia Pac J Ophthalmol Phila, 8 (2019), pp. 335-349, 10.1097/apo.0000000000000253
59 T. Kohnen, M. Herzog, E. Hemkeppler, et al.Visual performance of a quadrifocal (trifocal) intraocular lens following removal of the crystalline lens Am J Ophthalmol, 184 (2017), pp. 52-62, 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.09.016
60 S. Modi, R. Lehmann, A. Maxwell, et al.Visual and patient-reported outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens compared with those of a monofocal intraocular lens Ophthalmology, 128 (2021), pp. 197-207, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.015
61 M. Farvardin, M. Johari, A. Attarzade, et al.Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (Alcon Acrysof IQ® PanOptix) and extended depth of focus lens (Tecnis® Symfony® ZXR00 lens) Int Ophthalmol, 41 (2021), pp. 567-573, 10.1007/s10792-020-01608-w
62 P. Kanclerz, F. Toto, A. Grzybowski, et al.Extended depth-of-field intraocular lenses: an update Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol Phila Pa, 9 (2020), pp. 194-202, 10.1097/APO.0000000000000296
63 G. Łabuz, H.-S. Son, T. Naujokaitis, et al.Laboratory investigation of preclinical visual-quality metrics and halo-size in enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses Ophthalmol Ther, 10 (2021), pp. 1093-1104, 10.1007/s40123-021-00411-9
64 S.S. Akella, V.V. JuthaniExtended depth of focus intraocular lenses for presbyopia Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 29 (2018), pp. 318-322, 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000490
65 M.A. Gil, C. Varón, G. Cardona, et al.Visual acuity and defocus curves with six multifocal intraocular lenses Int Ophthalmol, 40 (2020), pp. 393-401, 10.1007/s10792-019-01196-4
66 B.C. Giers, R. Khoramnia, D. Varadi, et al.Functional results and photic phenomena with new extended-depth-of-focus intraocular Lens BMC Ophthalmol, 19 (2019), p. 197, 10.1186/s12886-019-1201-3
67 B. Cochener, Concerto Study GroupClinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: International Multicenter Concerto Study J Cataract Refract Surg, 42 (2016), pp. 1268-1275, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.033
68 D. Pilger, D. Homburg, T. Brockmann, et al.Clinical outcome and higher order aberrations after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens Eur J Ophthalmol, 28 (2018), pp. 425-432, 10.1177/1120672118766809
69 J.F. Zapata-Díaz, M.A. Rodríguez-Izquierdo, N. Ould-Amer, et al.Total depth of focus of five premium multifocal intraocular lenses J Refract Surg, 36 (2020), pp. 578-584, 10.3928/1081597x-20200720-01
70 G. Savini, N. Balducci, C. Carbonara, et al.Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens Eye, 33 (2019), pp. 404-410, 10.1038/s41433-018-0221-1
71 L.A. Romero, M.S. Millán, Z. Jaroszewicz, et al.Double peacock eye optical element for extended focal depth imaging with ophthalmic applications J Biomed Opt, 17 (2012), Article 046013, 10.1117/1.JBO.17.4.046013
72 W. Torres-Sepúlveda, A. Mira-Agudelo, J.F. Barrera-Ramírez, et al.Optimization of the light sword lens for presbyopia correction Transl Vis Sci Technol, 9 (2020), p. 6, 10.1167/tvst.9.3.6
73 K. Petelczyc, A. Byszewska, E. Chojnacka, et al.The Light Sword Lens - a novel method of presbyopia compensation: pilot clinical study PLoS One, 14 (2019), Article e0211823, 10.1371/journal.pone.0211823
74 Y.L. Liang, S.B. JiaClinical application of accommodating intraocular lens Int J Ophthalmol, 11 (2018), pp. 1028-1037, 10.18240/ijo.2018.06.22
75 M. Saiki, K. Negishi, M. Dogru, et al.Biconvex posterior chamber accommodating intraocular lens implantation after cataract surgery: long-term outcomes J Cataract Refract Surg, 36 (2010), pp. 603-608, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.008
76 J.S. Pepose, J. Burke, M.A. QaziBenefits and barriers of accommodating intraocular lenses Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 28 (2017), pp. 3-8, 10.1097/icu.0000000000000323
77 G. Marchini, P. Mora, E. Pedrotti, et al.Functional assessment of two different accommodative intraocular lenses compared with a monofocal intraocular lens Ophthalmology, 114 (2007), pp. 2038-2043, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.12.034
78 H.B. DickAccommodative intraocular lenses: current status Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 16 (2005), pp. 8-26, 10.1097/00055735-200502000-00004
79 J.L. Alió, A.B. Plaza-Puche, R. Montalban, et al.Near visual outcomes with single-optic and dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses J Cataract Refract Surg, 38 (2012), pp. 1568-1575, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.027
80 E.F. Marques, A. Castanheira-DinisClinical performance of a new aspheric dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens Clin Ophthalmol, 8 (2014), pp. 2289-2295, 10.2147/opth.s72804
81 M.M. Sadoughi, B. Einollahi, D. Roshandel, et al.Visual and refractive outcomes of phacoemulsification with implantation of accommodating versus standard monofocal intraocular lenses J Ophthalmic Vis Res, 10 (2015), pp. 370-374, 10.4103/2008-322x.176896
82 J.L. Alió, J. Ben-nun, J.L. Rodríguez-Prats, et al.Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept J Cataract Refract Surg, 35 (2009), pp. 1671-1678, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.04.043
83 G. Li, D.L. Mathine, P. Valley, et al.Switchable electro-optic diffractive lens with high efficiency for ophthalmic applications Proc Natl Acad Sci U A, 103 (2006), pp. 6100-6104, 10.1073/pnas.0600850103
84 J.L. Alio, A. Simonov, A.B. Plaza-Puche, et al.Visual outcomes and accommodative response of the Lumina accommodative intraocular lens Am J Ophthalmol, 164 (2016), pp. 37-48, 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.01.006
85 J.C. Kohl, L. Werner, J.R. Ford, et al.Long-term uveal and capsular biocompatibility of a new accommodating intraocular lens J Cataract Refract Surg, 40 (2014), pp. 2113-2119, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.10.011
86 J. Schrecker, A. LangenbucherVisual performance in the long term with secondary add-on versus primary capsular bag multifocal intraocular lenses J Refract Surg, 32 (2016), pp. 742-747, 10.3928/1081597x-20160630-02
87 C. Palomino-Bautista, R. Sanchez Jean, D. Carmona Gonzalez, et al.Spectacle independence for pseudophakic patients – experience with a trifocal supplementary add-on intraocular lens Clin Ophthalmol, 14 (2020), pp. 1043-1054, 10.2147/OPTH.S238553
88 S. Albayrak, Ö.B. Comba, M. KarakayaVisual performance and patient satisfaction following the implantation of a novel trifocal supplementary intraocular lens Eur J Ophthalmol, 31 (2020), pp. 2346-2352, 10.1177/1120672120969042
89 J. Schrecker, S. Blass, A. LangenbucherSilicone-diffractive versus acrylic-refractive supplementary iols: visual performance and manual handling J Refract Surg, 30 (2014), pp. 41-48, 10.3928/1081597x-20131217-05
90 X. Chen, J. Xu, X. Chen, et al.Cataract: advances in surgery and whether surgery remains the only treatment in future Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res, 1 (2021), p. 100008, 10.1016/j.aopr.2021.100008
91 L. Fernández-Vega, J.F. Alfonso, M.B. Baamonde, et al.Symmetric bilateral implantation of a distance-dominant diffractive bifocal intraocular lens J Cataract Refract Surg, 33 (2007), pp. 1913-1917, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.044
92 R.J. Olson, R. Braga-Mele, S.H. Chen, et al.Cataract in the adult eye preferred practice pattern Ophthalmology, 124 (2017), pp. 1-119, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.027
93 R.S. Davidson, D. Dhaliwal, D.R. Hamilton, et al.Surgical correction of presbyopia J Cataract Refract Surg, 42 (2016), pp. 920-930, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.05.003
94 M.A. Woodward, J.B. Randleman, R.D. StultingDissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation J Cataract Refract Surg, 35 (2009), pp. 992-997, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.031
95 R. Braga-Mele, D. Chang, S. Dewey, et al.Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation J Cataract Refract Surg, 40 (2014), pp. 313-322, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.011
96 K. Hayashi, S. Manabe, M. Yoshida, et al.Effect of astigmatism on visual acuity in eyes with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens J Cataract Refract Surg, 36 (2010), pp. 1323-1329, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.02.016
97 A. Liekfeld, A. Ehmer, U. SchröterVisual function and reading speed after bilateral implantation of 2 types of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses: add-on versus capsular bag design J Cataract Refract Surg, 41 (2015), pp. 2107-2114, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.055
98 T. Verdonck, L. Werner, S.N. D, et al.Clinical and surgical outcome of a supplementary multifocal intraocular lens implanted with a bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens: 5-year follow-up Ophthalmic Res, 64 (2021), pp. 503-511, 10.1159/000513790
99 D. Bozukova, L. Werner, N. Mamalis, et al.Double-C loop platform in combination with hydrophobic and hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens materials J Cataract Refract Surg, 41 (2015), pp. 1490-1502, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.10.042
100 J. Cezón Prieto, M.J. BautistaVisual outcomes after implantation of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with a +3.00 D addition J Cataract Refract Surg, 36 (2010), pp. 1508-1516, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.03.048
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies